0/25
0/15
You're viewing a shared evaluation — the answers below are a replay, not your own.
The PROOF audit

Is your agent a real agent — or a Bagent?

Score your own agent on the 25-point PROOF rubric — five categories, checkable sub-criteria, no gut calls. Answer honestly; the rubric doesn't care how good your demo looks.

Built from Vishal Mysore's PROOF essay (dev.to) — Planning · Reasoning · Orchestration · Observability · Feedback. All content glory to the original poster.

Bagent
0/25

Take it with you

Copy the full evaluation — verdict, every answer, the reasoning, a replay link, and credit to the essay — and paste it into an email, a deck, or a doc.

Copied.

Where this rubric comes from

Vishal scored the same job done two ways — in healthcare and in manufacturing — and the pattern held both times:

Version A — the Bagent · 3/25 and 4/25

A single unverified LLM call with real-world consequences riding on it. A live model wired straight to a physical actuator. A hazard, not an agent.

Version B — the real agent · 22/25 both times

Same job, same model possibly — but every consequential action grounded in a specific checkable piece of evidence, with a human or a rule-based check signing off before it acted.

His punchline: the gap isn't model quality. Don't spend your review time on whether the plan looks sophisticated — ask to see the trace of the last high-stakes decision, and who had to sign off before it acted. Read the full essay →

Powered by Vibe Rooster